Which action is least beneficial for promoting student engagement during discussions?

Cramming information is least beneficial for promoting student engagement during discussions because it typically involves presenting a large amount of information in a short time frame, which may overwhelm students rather than stimulate their interest or participation. This approach often leads to rote memorization instead of encouraging deeper understanding and reflection, making it less likely that students will engage meaningfully with the material or with each other.

In contrast, encouraging open-ended questions fosters critical thinking and allows students to explore their ideas more freely, enhancing their engagement. Utilizing multimedia tools can capture students' attention and present information in dynamic ways, further maintaining interest. Implementing peer critiques encourages collaboration and active participation, as students must engage with each other’s work, providing feedback and learning through discussion. Each of these strategies promotes a more interactive and engaging learning environment, unlike cramming.